Although these programs were thought to help, they
have been proven to be inadequate in preparing youth for independence. The Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing
Adoption Act of 2008 mandated that youth leaving foster care must leave through
safe reunification with their parents, adoption, guardianship or “another
planned permanent living arrangement” (Avery, 2010). The Act provides an option of extending financial
support to kin providers and older youth.
Mandates for notifying kin, analyzing kin foster care, and explaining
foster care benefits and requirements to kin are also included in the bill, but
until recently little attention was paid to acquiring permanence for youth or
post foster care. The lack of social
support was evident.
J. S. Coleman (2009) termed “social
capital” as a way to describe the complex social support system—fundamental
foundation—for foster youth. This “social
capital” includes parents, family members and other adults in their lives that
help youth achieve positive outcomes. Social
capital is important in helping youth develop a social trust, which is
important in developing acceptable behavioral social patterns. A trustworthy
social network is important for youth who are emerging into adulthood because family
relationships influence their psychological development. Independent living
programs was designed to prepare youth aging out of foster care to connect to
caring adults who could provide support, but it is well documented that these
types of programs have failed.
Youth in foster care as well as foster care alumni desire
permanence. Permanence is considered a
core need. This need includes reliable,
lifelong parenting relationships as well as maintaining contact with family and
other important people in their lives. Along with this need is the need for
independence. For youth exiting out of
care who do not achieve permanence, they are faced with incomplete education, significant
health problems, are unemployed or underemployed and socially isolated.
One project, the “Permanent
Parents for Teens” conducted to find permanence for youth is considered
successful. The project funded by the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services’ Children’s Bureau was designed to find
permanent adoptive parents for adoptive teens or committed permanent parents to
morally adopt teens not freed for adoption but in danger of discharge from
foster care to homelessness. The project,
conducted in New York City, focused on a child-specific recruitment approach
called Permanency Action Recruitment Teams (PART). The project accepted referrals and PART
meetings were attended by teens and all involved in their lives. Family
permanency advocates led the meetings and also worked with teens to identify potentially
permanent resources in their lives, reaching out to them and other relatives
not previously considered. Of the 199
teens referred to the program, 98 were placed into permanent homes by the end
of the project.
Based on the success of this project and similar types
where family members have been located and reunited with youth in foster care,
permanency is more than possible, it is a reachable goal for youth in foster
care.
No comments:
Post a Comment